OAR@˝ńČŐşÚÁĎ Collection:
/library/oar/handle/123456789/111132
2026-08-12T13:02:26ZAn annotation framework for variants that alter promoter transcription factor binding sites (nCODREG)
/library/oar/handle/123456789/119660
Title: An annotation framework for variants that alter promoter transcription factor binding sites (nCODREG)
Abstract: Transcriptional regulation is a complex biological process requiring the combined activity
of numerous molecules, including transcription factors, cofactors and chromatin
regulators. Transcription factors recognise and bind to short non-coding sequences known
as motifs found in genes’ regulatory regions, such as promoter, enhancer and silencer
regions. This allows transcription factors to modulate the recruitment and activation of
RNA polymerase II, the multiprotein complex responsible for the transcription of all
protein-coding genes. The presence of genetic variants in regulatory regions may disrupt
transcription factor binding, culminating in altered gene expression and protein
production. Indeed, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have flagged several
variants in regulatory regions associated with disease development and traits. Hence, the
annotation of variants residing in regulatory sites has become increasingly important in
genomic studies and disease interpretation.
This study describes the implementation of an annotation framework for variants residing
in gene promoter regions which may potentially create, delete or alter the binding affinity
of transcription factor binding sites. Variants are annotated by querying a publicly available
RESTful web-service called VEP, and a BioPython library called Bio.Motifs which computes
the position weight matrix (PWM) scores from two locally saved motif collections called
JASPAR and HOCOMOCO. The outcome is a list of promoter variants annotated with
transcription factors which may be affected by the variants, and the expected binding
ability at the variants’ site. Used together, the VEP and motif collections can strengthen
the outcome of a particular variant. Results on our dataset show that on average 12% of
Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) variant locations and 8.5% of Whole Genome Sequencing
(WGS) locations flagged by VEP were also flagged by JASPAR’s motif collection.
Compared to other motif finding tools, the implemented annotation framework automates
the whole annotation process by building the required nucleotide sequences adjacent to
the promoter variants, while ensuring the variants are always within the nucleotide
sequence being scanned by the motifs. In addition, the annotation process is able to scale
up according to the number of CPUs available on the running machine. Enabling multi-core
execution on a 4-core processor resulted in a 66% decrease in execution time of the dataset
compared to single-core execution, thus speeding up the annotation processing of millions
of variants within high-throughput sequencing data files.
Description: M.Sc.(Melit.)2022-01-01T00:00:00ZRecalibration of minor alleles in the human reference sequence
/library/oar/handle/123456789/111302
Title: Recalibration of minor alleles in the human reference sequence
Abstract: The intrinsic problem of minor alleles occupying reference positions in the Human Reference
Sequence build 37 may challenge the notion of accurate variant calling and result in variant
misinterpretation in the clinical practice. In this research study, a bioinformatics pipeline,
RecAl, was developed with the primary aim to detect all reference minor alleles and generate
three VCF files during sample analysis. These files include the false-positive variants, the
false-negative variants, and a separate corrected sample VCF file with the eliminated false-positive
variants and incorporated false-negative variants.
When the sample files were processed through RecAl, the percentage of false positives
variants detected for an alternate allele frequency threshold of 0.90, 0.95 and 0.99 were 9.7%,
7.5% and 5.4% respectively. For the false negative variants, RecAl identified 0.013%, 0.007%
and 0.005% respectively. Each of these variants were annotated using popular pathogenicity
prediction tools including CADD (Kircher M et al., 2014), Polyphen-2 (Adzhubei I et al., 2010)
and SIFT (Ng, P. and Henikoff, S., 2001). From the results, it was presented that 1.24% of the
false-positive variants and 0.87% of the false-negative variants are deleterious with significant
impact of sequence variation.
Additionally, the list generated through RecAl for reference minor alleles was compared to
the study carried out by Fuentes F et al., (2012) which focused on false-positive calls due to
reference minor alleles in exome regions. From this evaluation, 90% of the variants matched
which signifies that the problem of minor alleles occupying reference positions is still
prevalent and the list of reference minor alleles generated by RecAl is reliable. Lastly, a
comparative analysis of the reference minor alleles in the Human Reference build 37 was
compared to the reference minor alleles in build 38 to assess how many reference minor alleles
were corrected which resulted in only 9% being corrected.
Description: M.Sc.(Melit.)2022-01-01T00:00:00Z