OAR@պ Community:/library/oar/handle/123456789/193162026-08-02T02:40:48Z2026-08-02T02:40:48ZPostcolonial Directions in Education : volume 15 : issue 1Borg, CarmelBonello, CharmaineThapliyal, Nisha/library/oar/handle/123456789/1476642026-06-24T10:03:37Z2026-01-01T00:00:00ZTitle: Postcolonial Directions in Education : volume 15 : issue 1
Authors: Borg, Carmel; Bonello, Charmaine; Thapliyal, Nisha
Abstract: Internalised hegemonies : how Algerian academics perceive the “scientific-ness” of Arabic, French, and English. A mixed-methods study of linguistic coloniality in postcolonial higher education: Youcef J-T. Zidane; Federici’s and Robinson’s critiques of capitalism : thinking decolonising higher education in Uganda: Samuel Nyende; Buddhist criticism as a tool of decolonization : the evolution of Bhabha’s hybridity theory in contemporary Vietnamese literature: Nguyen Thanh Trung; Narratives of exile and belonging : a comparative ecocritical and postcolonial reading of Abdulrazak Gurnah and Leila Aboulela’s fiction: A. Haseena Bai and Subrahmania pillai; Indigenous knowledge versus Western science : redefining epistemic authority in museums: Maggie Selman2026-01-01T00:00:00ZInternalised hegemonies : how Algerian academics perceive the “scientific-ness” of Arabic, French, and English. A mixed-methods study of linguistic coloniality in postcolonial higher educationZidane, Youcef J-T./library/oar/handle/123456789/1476572026-06-24T10:21:36Z2026-01-01T00:00:00ZTitle: Internalised hegemonies : how Algerian academics perceive the “scientific-ness” of Arabic, French, and English. A mixed-methods study of linguistic coloniality in postcolonial higher education
Authors: Zidane, Youcef J-T.
Abstract: This paper examines how six decades after political independence; Algerian
academics continue to internalise and reproduce colonial hierarchies of
linguistic legitimacy within higher education. Drawing on mixed-methods data
from 442 researchers across disciplines and three generations, the study
reveals a profound paradox: Arabic commands the highest proficiency (mean
4.82/6) yet accounts for only 4% of academic publications, not primarily due
to external barriers, however, because researchers themselves have
internalised the belief that Arabic is “not a scientific language.” The paper
identifies three dimensions of internalised linguistic hierarchy: epistemic
disqualification (Arabic seen as incapable of expressing scientific concepts),
linguistic self-surveillance (researchers policing their own language choices),
and generational transmission (younger academics more fully accepting
English dominance). Quantitative analysis shows that even among
researchers with equivalent Arabic proficiency, those who internalise negative
views publish significantly less in Arabic and report higher rates of manuscript
abandonment. Generational analysis reveals that while the post-2000 cohort pragmatically accepts English dominance (58.2% state “English is the
language of science”), they simultaneously express the weakest attachments
to Arabic as a scientific language (40.4% devalue Arabic’s scientific capacity),
suggesting that internalised coloniality is not diminishing, on the other hand
merely transferring from French to English. The paper argues that genuine
decolonisation of higher education requires not merely replacing French with
English; instead, actively deconstructing the internalised beliefs about which
languages can legitimately produce knowledge. Findings contribute to
understanding how colonial power operates through the production of
consent, the internalisation of hegemonic standards by the colonised
themselves, and how these standards are reproduced through educational
institutions, curriculum, and academic evaluation systems.2026-01-01T00:00:00ZFederici’s and Robinson’s critiques of capitalism : thinking decolonising higher education in UgandaNyende, Samuel/library/oar/handle/123456789/1476612026-06-24T09:46:10Z2026-01-01T00:00:00ZTitle: Federici’s and Robinson’s critiques of capitalism : thinking decolonising higher education in Uganda
Authors: Nyende, Samuel
Abstract: In this paper, I engage with Silvia Federici’s and Cedric J. Robinson’s critiques
of capitalism to explore their relevance for thinking about the decolonisation
of higher education in Uganda. I argue that understanding the continuing
subordination and exploitation experienced by many participants in higher
education requires close attention to the broader socio-economic, political,
and culturally mediated inequalities within which higher education is
embedded. Grounded in a critical analysis of capitalism, the paper identifies
the sources, effects, and subjects of exclusion and discrimination, while also
illuminating potential avenues for transformation. It demonstrates that, from
its inception under colonial rule in Uganda, higher education has been deeply
exclusionary and elitist. The paper further places Federici’s and Robinson’s
critiques of capitalism in dialogue with one another and connects these
insights to the Ugandan higher education context. Ultimately, the paper
underscores the necessity of theorising and practising from the standpoint of
the exploited and oppressed, valorising multiple epistemic referents, and
fostering collective resistance to the elitist and market-driven structures
governing access to higher education. In doing so, it calls for renewed political
struggle to compel the state to socialise and democratise access to higher
education in Uganda.2026-01-01T00:00:00ZBuddhist criticism as a tool of decolonization : the evolution of Bhabha’s hybridity theory in contemporary Vietnamese literatureThanh Trung, Nguyen/library/oar/handle/123456789/1476432026-06-24T07:28:09Z2026-01-01T00:00:00ZTitle: Buddhist criticism as a tool of decolonization : the evolution of Bhabha’s hybridity theory in contemporary Vietnamese literature
Authors: Thanh Trung, Nguyen
Abstract: This article reimagines Homi Bhabha's hybridity theory through the lens of
Buddhist criticism, arguing that Mahāyāna concepts of impermanence, nonself,
and nirvana transform postcolonial anxiety into spiritual liberation.
Through close readings of Apocalypse Hotel (Ho Anh Thai) and The River
(Nguyen Ngoc Tu), the study reveals a transformation from postcolonial
anxiety to spiritual liberation. The Third Space becomes a ‘space of
impermanence,’ the Hybrid Subject evolves into a ‘non-self-hybrid,’ and
Mimicry transforms into ‘radical imitation.’ Using integrative intertextuality,
discourse analysis, and deconstructive reading, the article argues that
Buddhism not only expands but also decenters Bhabha’s theory, forming an
East Asian–inflected model of postcolonial literary criticism.2026-01-01T00:00:00Z